2015年3月9日星期一

給特區的信(139)- 回顧一下過去的電郵(2) [Possible Solution for Lack of Accommodation for The Mainland Tourist in the Forthcoming Months (Confidential) (20130317 ver.)]





---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: George Luk 
Date: 2015-03-09 14:19 GMT+08:00
Subject: 給特區的信(139)- 回顧一下過去的電郵(2) [Possible Solution for Lack of Accommodation for The Mainland Tourist in the Forthcoming Months (Confidential) (20130317 ver.)]
To: "Mr. Li Wei" <drc@drc.gov.cn>, "Mr. C Y Leung" <ceo@ceo.gov.hk>
Cc: "hd@1823.gov.hk" <hd@1823.gov.hk>, "Mr. Anthony Cheung" <sthoffice@thb.gov.hk>, "Mr. TAM Chi Yuen" <scmaoffice@cmab.gov.hk>, "Mr. TANG Kwok Wai" <scsoffice@csb.gov.hk>, "Mr. Tsang Tak Sing" <sha@hab.gov.hk>, "Ms. TENG Yu Yan" <doe@had.gov.hk>, George1 Luk 

李偉先生/梁振英先生:

1. 現時香港面對的大部份社會問題,如住宅區過份擠迫、居所面積太狹窄、街道上人車太多、社區設施不敷應用,醫院、學校、幼稚園不足,酒店旅館不足,各類型式樓宇、店鋪、商場、寫字樓樓價及租金狂升,中小企及中下階層苦不堪言,人人都滿肚嘮叨,找不到人發洩,便通通歸咎回歸以來,政府及公務員不好好做好份工,令問題纏繞及不斷惡化。其實問題是土地嚴重地短缺,只是港人不肯聚焦在這問題上。

2.  政府官員及公務員大都駡不還口,因為只要稍稍回應以作解釋,便只有招來更多的指責;這對任何人士都是非常不公道。

3. 請看看附件中幾封十多年前的電郵(曾經看過的,請不要覺得厭煩),因為:
 正如過去幾百封電郵,一直指出,各種型式的短、中、長期規劃,從上世紀七八十年代以來,承先啟後,就沒有停頓過或慢下來。
 住屋問題的各種措施,本港在面對如過山車般的環球經濟及樓價高低起伏,應該比較美、歐、日等處理得宜得多。
 從以下的舊電郵中,自由行帶來的不同問題,特區、廣東省及北京中央政府其實早有盤算,無論CEPA及開放自由行,都是按步實行的。
 在03年前的幾年,所有所謂「惠港措施」(其實甚多是互惠互利的),所需要的籌劃及談判,並非簡簡單單便可以獲得成果,因為90年代以來,大陸進步神速,此消彼長之下,大陸地方政府壯志雄心,不容忽視討價還價的難度,好在親建制及跟大陸有往還的人士,從旁協調,他們跟官員及公務員等耐性,理應獲得嘉許。但招來冷言冷語的聲討,認為媚共、將香港被規劃,滿足部份官商勾結,甚或替大陸官員作腐敗勾當。

4. 其實政府一直都有做好各種預備功夫,只是不斷被不同意見及不同利益持份者阻撓,令基建及各種設施,以至土地供應一直落後於形勢,引發今天各種社會問題的出現。但現在不是去追究誰是誰非的時候,而是要積極追回失地,解決眼前問題,推卸責任是無補於事的。

5. 其實大家若然客觀冷靜,平心靜氣的分析一下,香港與三藩市或多倫多兩地的情況,甚為相似,她們都是在「全球最大經濟體--美國」的一角。只不過香港就在正快速發展成為,另一個世界最大經濟體的一角,而香港對大陸的貢獻及影響力,比她們對美國的大得多,只是港人沒有自信心或受某種情意結影響,不願/不想或不能面對現實而已。

6. 多年來不斷為港人忽視或輕視的:-
 泛珠九省區+兩特區[9+2]規劃
 大珠三角九市+兩特區--2008-2020的大珠三角規劃綱耍(也叫9+2)
 回歸後一直進行的粤港合作框架會議
 CEPA 及其後多次的補充協議及03/04年沙士後的團體及個人自遊行
 各種跨境基礎建設,橋、路、關口、火車、高鐵、電力能源等等
 特區內各種基建項目,及提升各式各樣酒店與旅遊/會展設施
 積極提升與上述有關的相應軟件、教育、人材及培訓
 還有「六大產業,十大基建」
種種都不是即興的政績工程,而是在回歸後,部份更是英治時候,為未來三、四十年的長遠而進行規劃及按步施行。

7. 200510月,時任行政長官曾蔭權發表《20052006年度香港行政長官施政報告》,當中首次建議縮減香港邊境禁區範圍,旨在將香港邊境禁區縮減至維持公共秩序所需要的最小範圍,使到居民及其他香港市民可以自由進出開放了的地區。

8. 20069月,保安局和房屋及規劃地政局經過近一年時間研究後,訂立出新邊境界線禁區範圍,建議將範圍由約2,800公頃縮減至800公頃,保留了涉及多個邊境出入境管制站。當時,約70%邊境禁區屬於政府土地,約30%為私人土地,其中800900公頃屬於可以發展平地,包括落馬洲河套區、香園圍、蓮麻坑、缸瓦甫及沙頭角(一號閘前)等,其餘為濕地、山丘、鄉村及墳地等。

9. 香港政府經過廣泛諮詢後,於2008年公布將香港邊境禁區的陸地範圍由原來約2,800公頃,分為三個階段縮逐步縮減至約400公頃。

Regards,

George Luk



> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "annageor" <annageor@netvigator.com>
> To: "Lam K.K." <kklam@cpu.gov.hk>; "Chi Wang TE" <asfso@fso.gov.hk>
> Cc: <pahead@cpu.gov.hk>; <cso@cso.gov.hk>; <fso@fso.gov.hk>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 4:05 PM
> Subject: Re: Fw: Possible Solution for Lack of Accommodation for The
> Mainland Tourist in the Forthcoming Months (Confidential)
 (20130317 ver.)
>
Dear All,
>>
>> Wondering why you take so much time to make up your mind in holding a
>> meeting in respect to the captioned ?
>>
>> You all should know the words incorporating " FLATION ". "FLATION" by
> itself
 is not a word in the dictionary. But several words, by adding prefixes to
>> it, have been created :-
>>
>>                        Inflation                      
                   Deflation

>> Stagnflation                          
                 Disinflation
>>
>>                        Hyperflation                
                Reflation

>> Retroflation
>>
>> I learn from the Government announcements that we've been in deflation for
>> 57 months in a row. If their CPI definition isn't too far away from those
>> as taught in common economics, I see it as a falling or decreasing CPI,
> thus
>> producing negative percentage growth rate. There's less money available to
>> chase available goods & services and thus spiral-down prices without
>> bargaining power.
>>
>> Shouldn't we take appropriate action(s) to take advantage(s) of the CEPA &
>> influx of mainland tourists to shift to the necessary mild inflationary
>> condition.( Before the U.S. economy's getting worse)
 ( References :- Bob
>> Prechter's "Conquer the Crash"; Richard Russell's Dow Theory Letters ;
> Harry
>> Schultz's HSL ; Mark Faber's GloomDoomBoom.com ; Doug Noland's
>> PrudentBear.com ; Ed. Bugo's Safe Haven Preservation of Capital, &
>> CbsMatchwatch's the Callandra Report. As to the U.S. Federal debts, pls
>> refer to thepublicdebt.com of the U.S. Treasury Dept., which would
> probably
>> show you something around USD 6.8 Trillion in federal debt, with federal deficits
> in
>> the order of $600Billion -$1 Trillion)
>>
>> And shouldn't we try to shed some pressure from the beating yuan ?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> George
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Chi Wang TE" <asfso@fso.gov.hk>
>> To: "annageor" <annageor@netvigator.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2003 12:04 PM
>> Subject: Re: Fw: Possible Solution for Lack of Accommodation for The
>> Mainland Tourist in the Forthcoming Months (Confidential)

>>
Dear Mr. Luk,
>> >
>> > Thank you for your email of today.   We would be grateful if you could
>> > submit your suggestions in writing for Financial Secretary's ease of
>> > reference please.  Thank you.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> >
>> > Chi-wang Te
>> > Assistant Secretary
>> > Financial Secretary's Office
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >                  "annageor"             
 <annageor@netvigator.            com>
>> > To: <fso@fso.gov.hk>
>> >                      
                           cc: <cso@cso.gov.hk>
>>Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2003
>> >                                                      Subject: Fw:
 Possible Solution for Lack of Accommodation for
>>> The
 Mainland Tourist in the Forthcoming Months (Confidential)
>> >                       | [ ] Urgent |
>> >                       |------------|
>> >                       |-------------------|
>> >                       | [ ] Return        |
>> >                       |     Receipt       |
>> >                       |-------------------|
>> >
>> >Dear Henry,
>> >
>> > I'd like to appologize for my negligence in forwarding the captioned
> email
 to Donald, which I intend to send to you.
>> >
>> > The following's the content of the previous mail, pls take it as top
>> > priority and confidential. The case's been delayed for quite a while as
>> > beside the 2 below-mentioned offices, quite some others I've approached
>> have
 cause some unnecessary delay. And we need to get it ready before the
>> Mainland
s  Golden Holidays ASAP.
>> >
>> > The idea's including the Reits have been considered over a year among my
>> > close friends and I have a friend who can communicate to top guys in
> both
 Guangdong and Beijing, he tells that we at HK should take action
>> immediately
 without delay.
>> >
>> > Cheers & good health to all !!!
>> >
>> > George Luk
>> >
>> > P.S.
 I've no intention to include emails to others, but just let you know
>> > I've been struggling to get the right persons to sort things out soonest
>> > and fair to all parties.
>> > Some of the links might not work if they're not archived by the sites.
>> >
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: annageor
>> > To: cso@cso.gov.hk
>> > Sent: Friday, August 22, 2003 5:40 PM
>> > Subject: Possible Solution for Lack of Accommodation for The Mainland
>> > Tourist in the Forthcoming Months (Confidential)

>> >
>> > Dear Financial Secretary ( Mr. Henry Tang),
>> >
>> > I've been studing the solution for possible lack of hotel rooms HK when
>> the
>> > Disneyland's being completed in 2005 and the sudden increase of
>> Mainlanders
>> > since 2 years ago due to in
creasing nos. of wealthier Mainlanders.
>> >
>> > Hope to have a chance to discuss with you personally as the subject's
>> > becoming more and more imminent
>> > and people here in HK're suffering from too many problems, particularly
>> > financial ones.
>> >

>> > My suggestions'll get immediate solution to many parties :-
>> >

>> > 1) the tourism industry,
>> > 2) the hotelliers,
>> > 3) the HK retail shoppers in general,
>> > 4) the far too many vacant units in HK,
>> > 5) the residential units' owners,
>> > 6) the local developers,
>> > 7) the banks &
>> > 8) the healthier income to the Govt. to combat the deficit etc.
>> >

>> > The following's just for your info. only and pls treat with the
> strictest
>> > confidence.
>> >
>> > Cgeers & good health !!!
>> >
>> > George Luk
>> >
>> > P.S. Hope to have your response soonest.
>> >
>> >
>> >       "" Dear Selina,
>> >
>> >       The following's fyi only. Pls treat this as highly confidential.
>> >
>> >       Actually I've got a plan in mind to help both the HK tourism
> (hotel
>> >       rooms
>> >       for excessive increase of tourists within a very short time) & the
>> >       local
>> >       developers, which involves some near- to mid-term revision of some
>> >       regulations of the hotel accommodations.
>> >
>> >       Shall we talk ? you can reach me email
>> >       annageor@netvigator.com , pls don't reply directly as I've left
>> >       Swire Properties.
>> >
>> >       Cheers & good health !!
>> >
>> >       George
>> >
>> >       ----- Original Message -----
>> >       From: "George Luk"
>> >       To: <pahead@cpu.gov.hk>
>> >       Cc: <annageor@netvigator.com>
>> >       Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 1:11 PM
>> >       Subject: The Idea of A Pearl River Delta Metropolis
>> >
>> >
   Dear Mr. Lau,
>> >       >
>> >       > I refer to the several telecons with your
 Ms Au.
>> >       >
>> >       > 2 topics've put forward.
>> >       > (1) The rising Gold price in the last 1- 1/2 yrs. since the low
> at
>> >       Apr.,
>> >       > 2001 with the falling USD in the past few months.
>> >       > (2) The relationship of HK and the PRD regions :
>> >       > (a) I've suggested to some local Developers to voice out the
>> >       feasibility
>> >       of
>> >       > the 24-hrs cross-border issue and participation to the tender of
>> the
>> >       3
>> >       > largest lots land auction in Shenzhen.
>> >       > (b) I propose to see if some of my friends can be of help in the
>> >       closer
>> >       > cooperation/relationship among HKSAR and the Region.

>
>> >       > George
>
>

---------- 轉寄的郵件 ----------
寄件者: <ceo@ceo.gov.hk>
日期: 2015年3月6日 下午5:47
主旨: Re: 給特區的信(137)- 香港難道真要退為中國二線城市?
收件者: George Luk 

先生/女士: 

2月26日致行政長官的電郵,我獲授權認收,謝謝你的意見。 

行政長官私人秘書 
(麥佩儀 代行) 



---------- 轉寄的郵件 ----------
寄件者: <ceo@ceo.gov.hk>
日期: 2015年3月6日 下午5:41
主旨: Re: 給特區的信(136)- 有趣的分析(5)
收件者: George Luk

先生/女士:

2月25日致行政長官的電郵,我獲授權認收,謝謝你的意見。

行政長官私人秘書
(麥佩儀 代行) 


<如有興趣觀看之前的電郵,請前往連結: http://jet2468.blogspot.hk/ 。網誌內容主要是希望大家能對大陸、香港及週邊地區人士及政府多點理解/體諒,並以一般普羅大眾的觀點,加以進言。>

<閣下如不願意再接收由本人發出的郵件,請回電郵並在主旨寫上“移除”或“remove”。由此引致之不便,本人深表抱歉。>

沒有留言:

發佈留言