2015年3月18日星期三

給特區的信(143)-回顧一下過去的電郵(6)[香港的長遠規劃(2)及 給特區的信(37)- 反思問題]





---------- 轉寄的郵件 ----------
寄件者: George Luk 
日期: 2015年3月18日 
主旨: 給特區的信(143)-回顧一下過去的電郵(6)[香港的長遠規劃(2)及 給特區的信(37)- 反思問題]
收件者: "Mr. Li Wei" <drc@drc.gov.cn>, "Mr. C Y Leung" <ceo@ceo.gov.hk>
副本: "hd@1823.gov.hk" <hd@1823.gov.hk>, "Mr. Anthony Cheung" <sthoffice@thb.gov.hk>, "Mr. TANG Kwok Wai" <scsoffice@csb.gov.hk>, "Mr. Tsang Tak Sing" <sha@hab.gov.hk>, "Ms. TENG Yu Yan" <doe@had.gov.hk>, George1 Luk 

李偉先生/梁振英先生

1. 下面兩封電郵,都是有關香港的重大基建及長遠規劃,希望能儘早落實。其中紐約的2009年報告,值得參考,但勿忘記他們有三個機場。

2.  紐約市空域亦極度繁忙,在紐約-紐澤西-康乃狄克三角地帶有很多機場.
主要機場有三個,由 紐約與紐澤西港口事務管理局管理 主要負責定期航班.
Airport name
Airport code
約翰·菲茨傑拉德·甘迺迪國際機場
JFK
紐瓦克自由國際機場
EWR
拉瓜迪亞機場
LGA
IATA代碼 NYC」被保留給紐約市的三個機場

3. Airports serving   Paris, France:
  • Charles de Gaulle Airport – Paris's main international airport
  • Orly Airport – Paris's second international airport
  • Beauvais-Tillé Airport – the airport of Beauvais, serving as Paris airport for budget airlines
  • Paris–Le Bourget Airport – the original city airport
  • Châlons Vatry Airport – cargo airport at Châlons-en-Champagne, another airport serving as Paris airport for budget airlines   
  • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_Airport


Regards,

George Luk


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: George Luk
Date: 2011/6/18
Subject: 
香港的長遠規劃(2)
To: "Mr. Zhang-yutai" <drc@drc.gov.cn>, "Mr. Donald Tsang" <ceo@ceo.gov.hk>
Dear Messrs Zhang/Tsang,

香港人一直都有個很大的鬱結,在外國我們的親朋戚友,一般都是居住大屋,環境一流。相比其他發達地區,香港人可支配的入息(disposable income)比同GDP per capita 的地方大很多,因稅收低及購買力極高。卻要困在1,100平方公里的地方,幾百萬人居於其中不到200平方公里的市區或衛星城市中,空間太少了。
在外地,自駕遊可以穿州過省,非常暢快。在港就天天都只是走不出工作、購物、家中這壓迫感非常大的地方,連道路及休憩都是那麼困迫。我們應好好籌劃一下,如何令港人吐去心中的不快,如何可以擴大我們的工作、生活空間。
作為本港機場擴建的參考,請看附件(約37頁的 PDF Link http://www.pfnyc.org/reports/2009_0225_airport_congestion.pdf ),紐約
NYC)先兩年的一份關於他們三個機場的未來發展制約及規劃。 Executive summary 其中部份 :--
The future of the New York Metropolitan Region as a center of global commerce, finance and innovation requires an air transportation system that is efficient and universally accessible. In 2008, New Yorks three major regional airports served about 107 million passengers, including 32 million business travelers. To accommodate continued economic growth in the region, these numbers will need to increase in the years ahead.Unfortunately JFK, LaGuardia and Newark Liberty airports are already over-utilized and suffering from severe conditions of air traffic congestion.
Flight delays caused by air traffic congestion at the three airports were responsible for more than $2.6 billion in losses to the regional economy in 2008. If no action is taken, losses attributable to congestion will total a staggering $79 billion over the eighteen-year span from 2008 to 2025.
 These are the conclusions of analyses conducted for this report by HDR | Decision Economics, with input from Accenture, the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey and other expert sources.
This report establishes the cost of congestion for three categories of system users: travelers, the airline industry, and shipping companies.The total value of lost time to the traveling public was 
 $1.669 billion in 2008 and is projected to total over $50 billion from 20082025. For business travelers, the cost of the travel time lost to congestion delays at the three regional airports was $676 million in 2008, and is projected to be over $18 billion from 20082025. About half this cost is incurred by residents and businesses based in the region. The loss to leisure travelers in 2008 was $993 million, with an estimated cumulative cost of over $32 billion from 20082025.
The airline industry incurred significant losses in fuel and 
 staffing costs due to congestion, estimated at $834 million in 2008, and a total of $25 billion from 20082025.
Shipping companies that utilize both passenger and freight 
 aircraft also suffer losses from excessive delays. These losses were about $136 million in 2008, and would be about $4 billion between 2008 and 2025.
In addition to costs incurred by system users, the report identifies costs to the regional economy as a whole that result from productivity losses that are directly attributable to air traffic congestion.

Best Regards,

George Luk



---------- 轉寄的郵件 ----------
寄件者: George Luk 
日期: 2014327
主旨: 給特區的信(37)- 反思問題
收件者: "Mr. Li Wei" <drc@drc.gov.cn>, "Mr. C Y Leung" <ceo@ceo.gov.hk>
副本: "Mr. Tsang Tak Sing" <sha@hab.gov.hk>, "Ms. TENG Yu Yan" <anneteng@had.gov.hk>, George1 Luk李偉先生/梁振英先生:

1.  每一項長遠規劃,由最初有人提出,醞釀等等,直至建築完成,小則十餘年,多則幾十年(若不是胎死腹中的話)。以下為一個例子:興建連接新界西北及市區鐵路的提議早於1970年代出現,當時屯門新市鎮和元朗新市鎮正在開始發展,天水圍新市鎮亦剛開始發展。當然中間有很多枝節問題。

1. 1996年末,行政局把西鐵興建權批予九廣鐵路公司。主權移交後,特區政府大力推動基建的政策下,經走線重組及處理財務安排,港府終於在1998年授權九鐵公司興建西鐵。原先路線在節省成本的前提下,只連接天水圍新市鎮至深水埗新填海區的新車站,而延伸至屯門的鐵路,當局認為在輕鐵的幫助下,押後至第二期再作研究。(成本、經濟效益及輿論影響吧?)

2.  然而,在屯門區居民強烈反對下,政府最終同意把第一期計劃南延至屯門市中心。同年915日,行政會議正式通過興建西鐵工程的第一期,即興建連接屯門站至南昌站的鐵路路段,而這個耗資464億港元興建的鐵路系統於20031220日正式通車。

3.  西鐵線(West Rail Line),現為港鐵通勤鐵路線,主要連接新界西部及九龍西區,由九廣鐵路公司(簡稱九鐵公司)擁有並租予香港鐵路有限公司營運,於20031220日正式通車,並於2009816日伸延至紅磡站。

4.  西鐵通車時曾預期每日載客達20萬人次,但由於經濟不景,而且面對巴士競爭,鐵路不方便而車費又偏高,因此西鐵通車初期平均只有10萬人次使用。由於初期的市區車站並非位處心臟地段,亦使西鐵長期仍未達到其最初營運目標,且經常要依賴巴士接駁,競爭形勢一直不利。

5.  除此之外,西鐵通車初期故障頻生,九鐵公司主席田北辰曾公開承諾若西鐵故障情況再不改善,他會考慮辭職。及後西鐵於200481日推出月票計劃及同年1220日推出節日通日票計劃,才使每日載客量在200512月達到九鐵公司定下每日20萬人次使用的目標。但2014年立法會文件披露西鐵線最繁忙路段載客率和客量,若以每平方米四人站立密度計算,得出99%接近飽和的載客率。

6.  此外,西鐵通車初期客量偏低,與快速公路網路完善化不無關係。1998年大欖隧道啟用後,元朗區有了直達市區的快速公路,而屯門公路的塞車情況亦大大舒緩,再加上汀九橋、西九龍公路、西區海底隧道的配合;大量直接快捷而直達港九的巴士路線開辦,西鐵就顯得相形見拙了。

8.  如果這曾被狠批為大白象的建設還未獲批建造的話,超出原來預算絶不為奇。而這點並非最重要,最重要的是整個新界的交通及發展,如何獲得寸進?更遑論要在新界東、西北大量增加房屋供應。

9.  現時除了很多「十大工程」的項目外,還有很多其他重要工程/措施,須要即時進行,否則將來出了亂子,不知如何收科?例如:
① 機場第三跑道,
②  搭通東、西鐵的北環線,
③ 適當的填海造地及興建新發展區,
④  三堆一爐,
⑤ 高鐵的過關安排,甚或港珠澳大橋的過關安排;否則這些路線的行車時間,只要二、三十分鐘,而安檢及出入境却同樣花二、三十分鐘的話,豈非浪費了建造這些昂貴工程所取得的快速連繫兩地的原意?

Regards,

George Luk



---------- 轉寄的郵件 ----------
寄件者: CEO <ceo@ceo.gov.hk>
日期: 2014326 下午12:20
主旨: RE: 給特區的信(34)- 解決問題(4)
收件者: George Luk <gl2468@gmail.com>

George Luk
先生:

近日致行政長官的電郵,我獲授權認收。
行政長官私人秘書
(
姚一風 代行)



<如有興趣觀看之前的電郵,請前往連結: http://jet2468.blogspot.hk/ 。網誌內容主要是希望大家能對大陸、香港及週邊地區人士及政府多點理解/體諒,並以一般普羅大眾的觀點,加以進言。>
閣下如不願意再接收由本人發出的郵件,請回電郵並在主旨寫上“移除”或“remove”。由此引致之不便,本人深表抱歉。

2015年3月16日星期一

給特區的信(142)- 回顧一下過去的電郵(5)[ 香港的願景(59)- 分享]



---------- 轉寄的郵件 ----------
寄件者: George Luk
日期: 2015年3月16日 上午12:14
主旨: 給特區的信(142)- 回顧一下過去的電郵(5)[ 香港的願景(59)- 分享]
收件者: "Mr. Li Wei" <drc@drc.gov.cn>, "Mr. C Y Leung" <ceo@ceo.gov.hk>, "Mr. John Tsang" <fso@fso.gov.hk>
副本: "hd@1823.gov.hk" <hd@1823.gov.hk>, "Mr. Anthony Cheung" <sthoffice@thb.gov.hk>, "Mr. TAM Chi Yuen" <scmaoffice@cmab.gov.hk>, "Mr. TANG Kwok Wai" <scsoffice@csb.gov.hk>, "Mr. Tsang Tak Sing" <sha@hab.gov.hk>, George1 Luk

李偉先生/梁振英先生/曾俊華先生:

1. 能夠在這個平台,與很多人分享,個人對香港、大中華以至世界上各種不同事物的見解,可算是非常幸運。其他不同意見者未必會接納其中部份觀點,但只要他們能花少少時間看一下,從而知道其他人的不同意見或論據,我便認為目的已達。

2. 無可能要人人都認同,因為這是個極之自由及多元的社會。個人覺得很有意思,因為可以提出批評、見議;若然防碍到閣下的話,請通知停發。

Regards,

George Luk


---------- 轉寄的郵件 ----------
寄件者: George Luk 日期: 2013222日下午7:36
主旨: 香港的願景(59)- 分享
收件者: "Mr. Li Wei" <drc@drc.gov.cn>, "Mr. C Y Leung" <ceo@ceo.gov.hk>
副本: "Mr. John Tsang" <fso@fso.gov.hk>
李偉先生/梁振英先生/曾俊華先生:
1. 最近幾個月將電郵發給更多人士後,收到唔錯的回應;有極少部份,因意見不同或覺得太煩,要求不要再發。一方面頗為開心,另方面却收到谷歌Google提示,不可同一天內發太多,應改用其他網上發放形式;會積極考慮,以後少發一點。

2. 除了間中批評,間中提出建議(關於社會及/或政府的各種問題外),與其他人分享正面方式處理問題,欣賞本地以至地球村中各種事物,留意人際及社群間的悲歡離合;不但從中找到極多「進言」的材料,亦令自己領略到:關心及正面面對社會各式各樣問題,原來是「喜悅」多於「抱怨」。

3. 若大部份市民,都是生活於喜悅多於抱怨的情況下,這個社會將會是一個和諧的社會。但每個人對於喜悅和抱怨,都有不同的定義;在香港這個多元、自由的地方,對同一件事,可以有完全不同 的看法。普羅大眾以至所有公職人員,應該理解到,近乎荒謬及矛盾的各種社會現象,是在自由民主進步的社會生活,所必要付出的代價。

4. 明白這點,大家心中會舒服一點。市民相互之間,磨擦冲突會少一點。公職人員面對不同的抱怨甚或責罵,亦可以平常心來應對,因為除了要履行職責外,還要受輿論及民調的監督。

5. 相信大部市民、傳媒及壓力團體,都希望政府能有效率施政。無論回歸之前或之後,香港公職人員的效率及能力,幾十年來都是相當出色的(不是亂拍馬屁)。

Best Regards,

George Luk



---------- 轉寄的郵件 ----------
寄件者: <fso@fso.gov.hk>
日期: 2013220日下午2:51
主旨: RE: 修昔底德陷阱(The Thucydides Trap
收件者: George Luk 
George Luk
謝謝您於二月十六日致財政司司長的電郵,內容備悉。
敬頌
春安。


財政司司長辦公室政務主任林成豐



---------- 轉寄的郵件 ----------
寄件者: CEO <ceo@ceo.gov.hk>
日期: 2013219日下午5:35
主旨: Re: 香港的願景(58)- 為何要支持
收件者: George Luk
George Luk 先生:

29日至16日致行政長官的電郵收到,我獲授權認收。

行政長官私人秘書
(
姚一風 代行)



---------- 轉寄的郵件 ----------
寄件者: <ceo@ceo.gov.hk>
日期: 2015313日 下午4:49
主旨: Re: 給特區的信(139)- 回顧一下過去的電郵(2) [Possible Solution for Lack of Accommodation for The Mainland Tourist in the Forthcoming Months (Confidential) (20130317 ver.)
收件者: George Luk

George:

3
5 - 9日致行政長官的電郵收到,我獲授權認收,內容備悉。 

行政長官私人秘書
(
麥佩儀 代行

2015年3月13日星期五

給特區的信(141)- 回顧一下過去的電郵(4)




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: George Luk
Date: 2015-03-13 19:03 GMT+08:00
Subject: 給特區的信(141)- 回顧一下過去的電郵(4)
To: "Mr. Li Wei" <drc@drc.gov.cn>, "Mr. C Y Leung" <ceo@ceo.gov.hk>
Cc: "hd@1823.gov.hk" <hd@1823.gov.hk>, "Mr. Anthony Cheung" <sthoffice@thb.gov.hk>, "Mr. TAM Chi Yuen" <scmaoffice@cmab.gov.hk>, "Mr. TANG Kwok Wai" <scsoffice@csb.gov.hk>, "Mr. Tsang Tak Sing" <sha@hab.gov.hk>, "Ms. TENG Yu Yan" <doe@had.gov.hk>, George1 Luk


李偉先生/梁振英先生:

1. 以下的幾封舊電郵,可以約略看到當年至今,特區/廣東/泛珠(9+2)及北京中央面對的挑戰。(之前已經看過的,請見諒)

2. 當時北京中央極力推行這個泛珠(9+2)及大珠三角九市加兩特區(也叫9+2),其主要意義在於其發展模式,可為這十多年來全國的各種區域性(跨行政區)發展規劃作為參考。原因是行政壁壘往往是發展的最大障礙,當年直至今天,北京中央都極力避免各地「地方諸侯」對發展的阻礙,以及所謂「上有政策,下有對策」。

Regards,

George Luk



----- Original Message -----
From: "ceo" <ceo@ceo.gov.hk>
To: "annageor" <annageor@netvigator.com>
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 10:14 AM
Subject: [Fwd: Proposal Re : Getting up Speed in "9+2"]

> Dear Mr Luk,
>
> I refer to your mail of 25.6.2004 to the Chief Executive and am
> authorized to acknowledge receipt of it.  Thank you for writing to us.
>
>
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
>
> (Herman Tse)
> for Private Secretary to Chief Executive



 ----- Original Message -----
From: annageor
Sent: Friday, June 25, 2004 4:24 PM
Subject: Proposal Re : Getting up Speed in "9+2"

Dear Mr. Tung,

I have to express my appreciation on our civil servants' endurance & efficiency during all these years of not too good time.

Indeed, I like the communication with them. Pls get upto full steam ahead in the 9+2 project and inject the necessary resources to fortify them in the handling of such a huge and overwhelming work.

The attachments're fyi and in case you have any comments, pls contact by return email.

Regards,

George Luk



----- Original Message -----
To: annageor
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: Proposal RE: "9+2"

Dear George,

Many thanks for your note and would be very pleased to share with you on this subject again. I'll arrange  a mutually convenient time in due course.

Regards,

TK LEE
05/05/2004 13:28
       
              To:        "Lee TK" <tklee@cpu.gov.hk>
              cc:        "Lam K.K." <kklam@cpu.gov.hk>
"Lau SK" <siukailau@cpu.gov.hk>
              Subject:        Fw: Proposal RE: "9+2"


Dear TK,
 
Attached herewith a file on "Global Restructuring" from Stephen Roach, Beijing's good friend & M.D., Chief Economist of Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, who explains what actually happens when an economy changes structurally . He compares experiences of different countries and at the end he mentioned the influence on China and the Chinese economists.
 
Actually, during the past 8-10 years, HK 's experiencing such change. The downturn of the economy caused by such change and other international issues're out of HKSAR govt.'s control. Strong as the States, Germany & Japan, they all had and still have experience on their recessions. That's the point I think we need to have someone well-accepted to voice out and re-establish the Govt.'s image.
 
Furthermore, once the rate-hikes commence, the interest on the U.S.country-wide debts would be higher and higher and sooner than expected, will drag or halt its economy. So it's much better for China/HK to pick up asap before our export-oriented/led growth decelerate.
 
Looking forward to meet you again to offer different perspective in looking at & the follow-up on some macro- and micro- socionomic issues.
 
Regards,
 
George
 
----- Original Message -----
From: annageor
To: Lee TK
Cc: Lam K.K.
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2004 1:25 AM
Subject: Proposal RE: "9+2"

Dear TK,
 
I refer to our discussion yesterday morning in ur office and would like to summarise the major points for ur consideration, as follows:-
 
1.HKSAR Gov't have to accept there're necessary costs in order to properly commence/finish the "9+2" in order to achieve the major goals -
 
(a) successfully liaise, plan, formulate, coordinate and progress, complete all identifiable and workable projects within certain pre-determined criteria and time-frame, in priority
 
(b) to get the necessary cooperation among various regions/province/ministries in Beijing
 
(c) to get the full support of the whole SAR communities as well as neigboring communities, as the time resource is extremely limited and the extent extremely huge when comparing just to HKSAR.( approximates a EU but far backwards)
 
(d) Beijing would closely gauge HK's progress to rate our efficiency, flexibility as the overall results.
 
(e) how can we maintain free speech/democratic actions in a less confronting environment/situation. HK is still the biggest showcase for such action(s) which are our uniqueness, value and culture here ( just the same as many big international cities ) and shows the openness & ready to hear, discuss nature of Beijing central gov't.
 
(f) through the platform of CEPA & "9+2" would help the mainland in several areas such as
-creation of jobs for the ever-increasing umployment due to various reasons ;
-to tamper the problem of uneven income between rural and urbanized areas
-thru' better coordination/integration of proper work/services allocation, can lead higher disposable income thus vigorise consumer spending and also raise the % share of the service sector weighting in the total GDP.(more desired segregation of
sectors which contributes a more robust & sustainable economy)
 
(g) better counter-measures to combat inequality in benefits, opportunities and education, as well as
 
(h) the help to the SME which are considered the backbone of the economy and it's most resilient during the good & bad times.
 
 2. Personally, I think the relationship with the :
 
- the increasingly "hot" D-Democrats, and their supporters, the general public,
 
- the confronting P-Patriotics and their supporters,
 
- the neigbouring communnities' officials and the general public there,
 
- Beijing High officials
 
- and our own SAR Government officials, should be much upgraded so that focused effort can produce the results Beijing wants.
 
 3. I notice that quite a large no. of latest publications edited/compiled with genuine bold ideas, in the China.org.cn-Big 5 edition and many Central Govt's think-tanks, specialized bodies' publications have the necessary blue prints for the modernization/sustainable development of China .
 
All these blue prints may very much suitable to be our guidelines with specific time-frames and priorities.
Hope these may provide the platform for our projects as well as conveying the ideas to the resisting or confronting groups.
 
4. As the projects're of such a magnitude that we don't even dream of, extremely huge no. of talents, in tens of thousands or even millions from local( civil servants and private sectors), overseas, neigbouring areas, the existing intellectuals and even some opposing parties members should be included. Recognition and Respect plus sharing of responsibilties & accountabilities always work wonders.
 
Also the existing gov't staff must need to proportionately enlarge, thru' employment or outsourcing or engagement of specialized consultants.( bearing in mind the time frame, the enormous magnitude, quality and the nature of the projects)
 
5. For the kind of work to be accomplished, the total project costs and the subsequent revenues bring along, I think it warrants to be far more agressive in our budget proposal and sometimes, even deficit spending can be considered.
 
In order to get the buy-in of the Democrats/Patriotics/Neighouring regional gov't official/ the general public and even Beijing, special Commission/ Dept/ Semi-gov't bogies and so on together with Image-building and PR/HR/other specialised Consultants should be established to help release the burden from our officials.
 
6. Besides 5. a large no. of reknown mediators , who're well-received scholars, intellectuals, professionals with neutral mindsets can be invited to follow up on the buy-in of the various non-conforming parties/general public by explaining the imminent situation and urgency of the projects. Such that the responsible SAR official may have ample time in planning and dealing their (9+2) works
 
7. During this difficult time in securing necessary funding for many highly desirable infrastucture projects, may slow down the overal peogress of the project. To help arragement of such not only solve their problem, yet promote HK's status as a leader and will not cause much harm to the existing mainland banking system.
 
8. Educate HK citizens to take jobs in the "9+2" for transfering of knowledge/experience that can promote our influence to those regions & their people to accept our culture, value, integrity and other merits.
 
When the more than 400M of the people pick up to standard and quality of living quite close to us, I think the economy will be somewhere near that of EU and thus sustained prosperity can be assured for many decades.
 
Pls let me have your comments and where & when I can be of help.
 
Regards,
 
George.


<如有興趣觀看之前的電郵,請前往連結: http://jet2468.blogspot.hk/ 。網誌內容主要是希望大家能對大陸、香港及週邊地區人士及政府多點理解/體諒,並以一般普羅大眾的觀點,加以進言。>

閣下如不願意再接收由本人發出的郵件,請回電郵並在主旨寫上“移除”或“remove”。由此引致之不便,本人深表抱歉。

2015年3月11日星期三

給特區的信(140)- 回顧一下過去的電郵(3)




---------- 轉寄的郵件 ----------
寄件者: George Luk
日期: 2015年3月11日 下午2:47
主旨: 給特區的信(140)- 回顧一下過去的電郵(3)
收件者: "Mr. Li Wei" <drc@drc.gov.cn>, "Mr. C Y Leung" <ceo@ceo.gov.hk>
副本: "hd@1823.gov.hk" <hd@1823.gov.hk>, "Mr. Anthony Cheung" <sthoffice@thb.gov.hk>, "Mr. TAM Chi Yuen" <scmaoffice@cmab.gov.hk>, "Mr. TANG Kwok Wai" <scsoffice@csb.gov.hk>, "Mr. Tsang Tak Sing" <sha@hab.gov.hk>, "Ms. TENG Yu Yan" <doe@had.gov.hk>, George1 Luk

李偉先生/梁振英先生:

1. 朋友說如果每年訪港旅客達到7千3百萬人次的話,即約每天二十萬人次(當然會有旺淡季之分),若其中一半,即約十萬人,在港逗留兩至三天的話,在遊旅客最多會使香港的旅客人口增加四十萬左右,即增加約5至6%人口。

2. 由於他們主要聚集在東鐵及西鐵沿線的購物區,故形成過份集中、擠迫,以至容易引起矛盾或衝突。過份集中會對購物區附近居民及交通形成壓力,其主因是這十年多來,本港在近深圳邊境從解除禁區所釋放出來的土地,大量棄置的農耕地及/或棕土、鄉郊屋地,因種種原因,未有被好好開發利用。

3. 上述土地,少說也比整個九龍市區(約47平方公里):http://www.landsd.gov.hk/mapping/en/publications/hk_geographic_data_sheet.pdf
大得多,而九龍居民加上旅遊人口,估計超過250萬人。若所有旅客都在一個面積大於九龍的地方活動,應該不會太影響到一般市民的日常生活;而旅客不會只在近深圳的邊境地區活動,他們也會到各區景點遊玩及購物。那麼港陸的矛盾、衝突便會大大減少,達致共贏共榮的境況。港九市區全景請參看連結: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/fd/HK_Kowloon_Panorama_2009.jpg

4. 當然要發展好一個比九龍還大的區域,不可能十年八載便做得到。但若然其中五份之一的地方能獲得各方同意,早做好三通一平,起碼隨時拿得出一千公頃平整好的土地,去建造佔地幾十萬平方公尺的單層或雙層購物商場,相信不消三個月就可供旅客應用。還是老套的一句:不要互相推卸責任,而是盡快追回失地。

5. 朋友繼續說,另一個問題亦要考慮,就是為何拿港人的土地,做好基建(需要人力、物力),不用來建屋給低下階層以至中產人士之用,而要益商界、鄉親父老、地產商及水貨客。

6. 只要幾句類似「官商勾結」、「利益輸送」、「權錢交易」、「地產霸權」[來自英文原名:Land and the Ruling Class in Hong Kong 一書(香港的土地與統治階層)是一本分析香港地產業現象的書籍。作者為潘慧嫻,中文版《地產霸權》譯者為顏詩敏]等等,哪有政府部門夠胆承擔?亦是為何邊境購物城「講來講去,都是得個講字」。

7. 以上第六段所提及的,其實是異常窒礙整個香港的各種發展,並常常引發階級矛盾,社會不安寧;頗值得港人深思!!!

8. 以下附上201184日「香港的長遠規劃(7)― 十二五規劃與廣東:國家最重視是粵港澳關係」這舊電郵供大家參考,裏面每一條連結,都非有意思

Regards,

George Luk



---------- 轉寄的郵件 ----------
寄件者: George Luk 
日期: 201184
主旨: 香港的長遠規劃(7):十二五規劃與廣東:國家最重視是粵港澳關係
收件者: "Mr. Li Wei" <drc@drc.gov.cn>, "Mr. Donald Tsang" <ceo@ceo.gov.hk>
Messrs Li Wei/Donald Tsang,

  (1)   希望大家盡力加把勁,港澳特區沒有時間再去擔擱;大量工作等著要做,請參考以下鏈結:
粵港合作框架協議,本協議有效期從正式簽署之日(2010/4/7)起到20201231

 (2)  粵澳合作框架協議,(2011/1/24)正式簽署:
 
 (3)   711日,中國外交部副部長傅瑩訪問香港並出席晚宴,發表題為《後危機時代的中西方關係和香港的作用》的演講 她說,香港始終是溝通中國和西方的橋樑。在越來越多的內地企業選擇走出去,開拓國際市場的背景下,香港依靠自身在資訊、專長和人才等方面的優勢,繼續發揮橋樑作用,必將大有可為。:--

 (4)十二五規劃與廣東:國家最重視是粵港澳關係 :--

 (5)廣東多個重點項目寫入十二五規劃
       進一步促進廣東金融創新
 國家發改委主任張平昨日在十二五規劃綱要新聞發佈會上說,廣東是我們國家改革開放的前沿,在30多年的改革開放中取得了巨大成績,也為全國的改革開放做出了榜樣,有許多政策在廣東先行先試,取得成效以後在全國推廣開。新時期,作為改革開放前沿陣地排頭兵的廣東還將大有作為。
 國家發改委副主任朱之鑫則透露,當前,進一步促進廣東地區的金融創新,對全國的輻射作用和示範作用非常必要。在金融改革的創新方面,國務院有關部門和廣東省政府正在制定方案,研究編制金融改革和創新領域專項改革規劃和政策。

      港澳臺首次單獨成章
 與以往規劃綱要不一樣,此次十二五規劃綱要首次將香港、澳門和臺灣單獨列為一章來撰寫。張平透露,這是根據港、澳特區政府提出的建議,也是港、澳各界人士的建議。
 國家發改委副主任徐憲平說,為了內地與港澳地區的合作,特別是粵港澳合作,他們還特意在深化合作,建設中華民族共同家園這一篇中專門設立了一個專欄,列出了7粵港澳合作重大項目。
 南方都市報從今天開始將推出“‘十二五規劃與廣東系列報導,全方位解讀十二五規劃中的廣東元素。
   
十二五規劃中的廣東元素
 建設北京、上海、廣州、深圳等城市軌道交通網路化系統。
 建設北京新機場,擴建廣州、南京、長沙、海口、哈爾濱、南寧、蘭州、銀川等機場。
 推進山東、浙江、廣東等海洋經濟發展試點。
 推進京津冀、長江三角洲、珠江三角洲地區區域經濟一體化發展。
 建成京津冀、長江三角洲、珠江三角洲三大城市群城際交通網路,推進重點開放區域城市群的城際幹線建設。
 加大長江中下游、珠江流域和生態脆弱的高原湖泊水污染防治力度,推進渤海等重點海域中和治理。
 深化深圳等經濟特區、上海浦東新區、天津濱海新區開發開放,加快上海國際經濟、金融、航運、貿易中心建設。
 加快構建沿隴海、沿京廣、沿京九和沿長江中游經濟帶,促進人口和產業的集聚,加強與周邊城市群的對接和聯繫。
 加強內地和香港、澳門交流合作,繼續實施「更緊密經貿關係安排」

深化粵港澳合作,落實粵港、粵澳合作框架協定,促進區域經濟共同發展,打造更具綜合競爭力的世界級城市群  : http://www.pprd.org.cn/guangdong/news/201103/t20110307_144812.htm

(5)兩地特區人士在國內的基地,已經發展至全泛珠三角其他九個省區,甚或全中國。相信建制派內很多人,應該最清楚,他們雖然過去三、四十年,都嘗過不少地方的苦頭,但由於相信大陸的發展,大部份人都得到應得的利潤。希望本地的年青人都可以有很大的發展。

Best Regards,

George Luk



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <doe@had.gov.hk>
Date: 2015-03-10 10:37 GMT+08:00
Subject: Re: 
給特區的信(139)- 回顧一下過去的電郵(2) [Possible Solution for Lack of Accommodation for The Mainland Tourist in the Forthcoming Months (Confidential) (20130317 ver.)
To:

George Luk 
先生:

謝謝你於201535日及9日的電郵。本處已備悉你的意見。

東區民政事務專員
(
吳穎嫻  代行


<如有興趣觀看之前的電郵,請前往連結: http://jet2468.blogspot.hk/ 。網誌內容主要是希望大家能對大陸、香港及週邊地區人士及政府多點理解/體諒,並以一般普羅大眾的觀點,加以進言。>

閣下如不願意再接收由本人發出的郵件,請回電郵並在主旨寫上“移除”或“remove”。由此引致之不便,本人深表抱歉。